INTERTIE PARTICIPANTS GROUP MEETING 1/2/03
SOUTHERN INTERTIE 

TESTIMONY OF EARLE AUSMAN

 

Dear Members

 

I appreciate the opportunity to address the IPG this morning.

 

To briefly give you some information on my background I am a consulting registered engineer who works in the energy field and I have a special interest in efficiency and renewable energy.  I am a 53 year resident of Alaska and have worked on NPRA, TAPS and ANGTS projects.  I was a member of AKPIRG and I also am a CEA member.

 

As a CEA member, I am very concerned with the matter of the economics of the Southern Intertie.  The apparent approvals were achieved by the lack of disclosure of an earlier study that showed the project was uneconomical.  The fact that a new study with different conclusions followed right after and was used to get approval for the Southern Intertie is highly suspicious.

 

However, even assuming that the second study is correct, which is questionable, the economics are highly dependent on costs, and assumptions where a slight shift can easily result in losses to the consumer.

 

If consideration is given to the state’s subsidy of 70 million dollars it is clear that the Intertie is a loser.  The people who will lose this money are members of the Railbelt that could use this money for other important needs such as schooling.  For those who argue that the Intertie has long-term values, so does the education of our children.  And, we have to educate our children; we do not need to subsidize electricity.  The transfer of money, spoils, can be accomplished by asking the legislature to reallocate the money that has been slated for the Railbelt.

 

Electric power in the Railbelt should not be subsidized.  It sends the wrong price signals to the market and results in the misallocation of economic resources. 

 

There are a number of powerful interests in the State that want to use your public money for their own benefit.  They are not concerned with the costs borne by the general public.  The Southern Intertie project appears to fall into this category.

 

Earle Ausman, PE

1503 W 33rd Ave., Suite 310

Anchorage, AK 99503

258-2420, Fax  258-2419

Earle@gci.net  

 

-------------------------------------------

 

Additional background

 

Mr. Ausman also has worked on a transmission study for the Corps to get power from Bradley Lake to Anchorage.  He worked on a diversion dam for Bradley as well as other sources of water.

 

He also was a major designer for the Snettisham Transmission Line, and wrote the first EIS for that project. It was quite early and there were no guidelines on what an EIS should be.  His firm, Polarconsult also did the lake tap design and the tunnel mapping of the Crater Lake phase of Snettisham.  He did the HVDC study for Snettisham as well as looked into interconnection of SE Alaska via DC cables.  These were much less expensive and more reliable than land lines in that rugged terrain.